<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of because an alternative appellate remedy was available under the CGST Act, and the petitioner was left at liberty to file an appeal. The court also permitted the petitioner to seek expeditious consideration of the request for release of the vehicle in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of because an alternative appellate remedy was available under the CGST Act, and the petitioner was left at liberty to file an appeal. The court also permitted the petitioner to seek expeditious consideration of the request for release of the vehicle in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>