<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</link>
    <description>The petitioner contested the proceedings under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, which imposed a penalty of Rs.21,41,239 and confirmed tax of Rs.3,85,423. The HC determined that the petitioner should appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, allowing one week to file the appeal. The HC also ordered the release of the seized vehicle during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1456 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</link>
      <description>The petitioner contested the proceedings under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, which imposed a penalty of Rs.21,41,239 and confirmed tax of Rs.3,85,423. The HC determined that the petitioner should appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, allowing one week to file the appeal. The HC also ordered the release of the seized vehicle during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>