https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457529 The HC quashed the impugned orders due to violations of natural justice, including insufficient time for the petitioner to present their case and lack of reasoning in the ex parte order. The petitioner was directed to deposit a percentage of the total amount for appeal. The bank accounts were unfrozen, and the petitioner was required to appear before the Assessing Authority. The case was to be decided on merits, with no coercive steps during proceedings. A speaking order with reasons was mandated, and the petitioner retained the right to challenge the order. The case was to be handled expeditiously, preferably within two months. en-us Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 22 Sep 2024 07:19:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457529 The HC quashed the impugned orders due to violations of natural justice, including insufficient time for the petitioner to present their case and lack of reasoning in the ex parte order. The petitioner was directed to deposit a percentage of the total amount for appeal. The bank accounts were unfrozen, and the petitioner was required to appear before the Assessing Authority. The case was to be decided on merits, with no coercive steps during proceedings. A speaking order with reasons was mandated, and the petitioner retained the right to challenge the order. The case was to be handled expeditiously, preferably within two months. Case-Laws GST Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457529