<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 777 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457511</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that a deadlock existed in the company&#039;s affairs, warranting the sale of the petitioner&#039;s shares to the second respondent. The parties were instructed to agree on a valuer to determine the share value. This resolution aimed to facilitate the petitioner&#039;s exit and restore the company&#039;s operational stability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 777 - THE COMPANY LAW BOARD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457511</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that a deadlock existed in the company&#039;s affairs, warranting the sale of the petitioner&#039;s shares to the second respondent. The parties were instructed to agree on a valuer to determine the share value. This resolution aimed to facilitate the petitioner&#039;s exit and restore the company&#039;s operational stability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>