https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457510 The petition was dismissed with costs, upholding the Labour Court's decision that respondents were entitled to equal wages as regular employees, and the petitioner, as the principal employer, was liable for these wages. The court reinforced the principle of "equal pay for equal work" and the statutory obligations under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. The Labour Court's jurisdiction under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was affirmed, and the previous Central Government decision did not impact the maintainability of the claim. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:39:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457510 The petition was dismissed with costs, upholding the Labour Court's decision that respondents were entitled to equal wages as regular employees, and the petitioner, as the principal employer, was liable for these wages. The court reinforced the principle of "equal pay for equal work" and the statutory obligations under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. The Labour Court's jurisdiction under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was affirmed, and the previous Central Government decision did not impact the maintainability of the claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457510