<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax law amendment restricting input tax credit availability challenged; court seeks reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81588</link>
    <description>The imposition of a time limit for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) is violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution of India. The insertion of sub-section (5) u/s 16 of the CGST Act, effective from July 1, 2017, provided that for invoices or debit notes pertaining to Financial Years 2017-18 to 2020-21, the registered person could take ITC in any return filed until November 30, 2021. However, this decision was taken without considering the stipulation in sub-section (5) of Section 16, effective from July 1, 2017. Consequently, the High Court remitted the matter to the authority to pass a fresh order considering the implication of sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:29:47 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:29:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax law amendment restricting input tax credit availability challenged; court seeks reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81588</link>
      <description>The imposition of a time limit for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) is violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A of the Constitution of India. The insertion of sub-section (5) u/s 16 of the CGST Act, effective from July 1, 2017, provided that for invoices or debit notes pertaining to Financial Years 2017-18 to 2020-21, the registered person could take ITC in any return filed until November 30, 2021. However, this decision was taken without considering the stipulation in sub-section (5) of Section 16, effective from July 1, 2017. Consequently, the High Court remitted the matter to the authority to pass a fresh order considering the implication of sub-section (5) of Section 16 of the CGST Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:29:47 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>