<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1227 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758983</link>
    <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was challenged, but the petition was disposed of because an efficacious appellate remedy was available against the cancellation order. The petitioner was given liberty to pursue the statutory appeal within the stipulated period, leaving the merits of the cancellation unexamined in the writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1227 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758983</link>
      <description>Retrospective cancellation of GST registration was challenged, but the petition was disposed of because an efficacious appellate remedy was available against the cancellation order. The petitioner was given liberty to pursue the statutory appeal within the stipulated period, leaving the merits of the cancellation unexamined in the writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>