<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1229 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758985</link>
    <description>HC allowed withdrawal of writ petition challenging tax order after respondent acknowledged a typographical error in tax period. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal under Section 107 of CGST within two weeks, with appellate authority directed to decide within six weeks. Alternative remedy of appeal deemed appropriate, rendering writ petition unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 19:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1229 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758985</link>
      <description>HC allowed withdrawal of writ petition challenging tax order after respondent acknowledged a typographical error in tax period. Petitioner granted liberty to file appeal under Section 107 of CGST within two weeks, with appellate authority directed to decide within six weeks. Alternative remedy of appeal deemed appropriate, rendering writ petition unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>