https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758964 The writ petition challenged notifications extending the time limit for passing adjudication orders under the GST regime, contending that they were issued without jurisdiction and contrary to the governing statutory framework. The matter was treated as raising a pure question of law and as requiring determination on affidavit, with a prima facie case found for interim protection. Coercive recovery was therefore restrained for the interim period pending further adjudication. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 May 2025 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758964 The writ petition challenged notifications extending the time limit for passing adjudication orders under the GST regime, contending that they were issued without jurisdiction and contrary to the governing statutory framework. The matter was treated as raising a pure question of law and as requiring determination on affidavit, with a prima facie case found for interim protection. Coercive recovery was therefore restrained for the interim period pending further adjudication. Case-Laws GST Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758964