<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1212 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758968</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petition challenging registration cancellation order. The court found the order arbitrary and lacking substantive reasoning. It set aside the original cancellation, directing the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice within three weeks for a fresh administrative decision. The ruling emphasized the constitutional requirement of providing clear, cogent reasons in quasi-judicial proceedings to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2025 21:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1212 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758968</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petition challenging registration cancellation order. The court found the order arbitrary and lacking substantive reasoning. It set aside the original cancellation, directing the petitioner to respond to the show-cause notice within three weeks for a fresh administrative decision. The ruling emphasized the constitutional requirement of providing clear, cogent reasons in quasi-judicial proceedings to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>