<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1214 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758970</link>
    <description>Appeal dismissed as time-barred was set aside where the appellate authority failed to consider the explanation for delay and ignored a bona fide pre-deposit; the decision explains that a ten percent pre-deposit evidenced good faith and that mere belated filing, coupled with such deposit and explanation, did not justify summary dismissal on limitation grounds, resulting in vacatur of the appellate order and restoration of the appellants right to pursue the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1214 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758970</link>
      <description>Appeal dismissed as time-barred was set aside where the appellate authority failed to consider the explanation for delay and ignored a bona fide pre-deposit; the decision explains that a ten percent pre-deposit evidenced good faith and that mere belated filing, coupled with such deposit and explanation, did not justify summary dismissal on limitation grounds, resulting in vacatur of the appellate order and restoration of the appellants right to pursue the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>