<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1190 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758946</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263. The tribunal held that the PCIT failed to provide specific findings on how the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. The AO had already conducted proper enquiries regarding accommodation entries during section 147 proceedings. The PCIT impermissibly used section 263 proceedings merely to extend assessment timelines under section 147. The tribunal emphasized that to invoke section 263, the PCIT must demonstrate through independent findings that the AO took a legally unsustainable view, which was not established in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1190 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758946</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263. The tribunal held that the PCIT failed to provide specific findings on how the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. The AO had already conducted proper enquiries regarding accommodation entries during section 147 proceedings. The PCIT impermissibly used section 263 proceedings merely to extend assessment timelines under section 147. The tribunal emphasized that to invoke section 263, the PCIT must demonstrate through independent findings that the AO took a legally unsustainable view, which was not established in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>