<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1188 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758944</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s revision petition under section 263. The tribunal upheld PCIT Jaipur-1&#039;s jurisdiction, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim of address change without supporting evidence from PAN database records. Regarding section 56(2)(x) applicability, the tribunal found that two property deeds had different areas and consideration amounts, contradicting the assessee&#039;s claim they related to the same property. The assessee failed to provide adequate documentation including TDS details under section 194IA. The tribunal found no merit to deviate from PCIT&#039;s findings and dismissed all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1188 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758944</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur dismissed the assessee&#039;s revision petition under section 263. The tribunal upheld PCIT Jaipur-1&#039;s jurisdiction, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim of address change without supporting evidence from PAN database records. Regarding section 56(2)(x) applicability, the tribunal found that two property deeds had different areas and consideration amounts, contradicting the assessee&#039;s claim they related to the same property. The assessee failed to provide adequate documentation including TDS details under section 194IA. The tribunal found no merit to deviate from PCIT&#039;s findings and dismissed all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>