<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2053 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment as invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of objections related to the re-opening under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal ruled that the re-opening was beyond jurisdiction since the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the re-opening occurred beyond the four-year period. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the necessity for proper procedural adherence and disclosure in assessment processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2053 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment as invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to dispose of objections related to the re-opening under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal ruled that the re-opening was beyond jurisdiction since the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the re-opening occurred beyond the four-year period. The appeal was allowed, underscoring the necessity for proper procedural adherence and disclosure in assessment processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>