<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1399 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457508</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order under the Odisha GST Act was tested against the availability of the statutory appeal remedy and an earlier binding decision covering the same controversy. The court disposed of the petition in terms of that earlier decision and did not express any opinion on the merits. The text indicates that maintainability was considered in light of the alternate statutory remedy and prior precedent, rather than by fresh merits adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1399 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457508</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an adjudication order under the Odisha GST Act was tested against the availability of the statutory appeal remedy and an earlier binding decision covering the same controversy. The court disposed of the petition in terms of that earlier decision and did not express any opinion on the merits. The text indicates that maintainability was considered in light of the alternate statutory remedy and prior precedent, rather than by fresh merits adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>