https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38412 Separate notice under section 171(2) was not treated as fatal where a family member had effectively represented the concerned branch in the partition enquiry and no substantive conflict of interest was shown. The Court also held that writ interference was unwarranted because the same issue could be examined in the pending statutory appeal, in which the petitioners had already appeared. The writ court therefore declined to interfere, left the appellate authority to decide the matter on merits, and preserved liberty for the petitioners to seek further recourse if the appeal was found not maintainable. en-us Mon, 06 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:55:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38412 Separate notice under section 171(2) was not treated as fatal where a family member had effectively represented the concerned branch in the partition enquiry and no substantive conflict of interest was shown. The Court also held that writ interference was unwarranted because the same issue could be examined in the pending statutory appeal, in which the petitioners had already appeared. The writ court therefore declined to interfere, left the appellate authority to decide the matter on merits, and preserved liberty for the petitioners to seek further recourse if the appeal was found not maintainable. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 06 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38412