<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, as the Commissioner lacked adequate reasoning and evidence for deeming the original assessment as erroneous. The failure to address objections raised by the assessee rendered the order improper. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision without costs, emphasizing the necessity for clear justification in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 28 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, as the Commissioner lacked adequate reasoning and evidence for deeming the original assessment as erroneous. The failure to address objections raised by the assessee rendered the order improper. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision without costs, emphasizing the necessity for clear justification in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>