<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1112 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457483</link>
    <description>A voluntary statement made before enforcement can be relied on in foreign exchange contravention proceedings even if later retracted, provided the retraction does not establish inducement, threat, or coercion. The statement may also be supported by co-noticee material and recovered documents, including electronic records, which can provide independent corroboration of unauthorised foreign exchange transactions outside India. In quasi-criminal proceedings of this kind, the department need only establish the case on a preponderance of probabilities, and the evidence need not satisfy mathematical precision. On that basis, the finding of contravention was upheld and the penalty sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1112 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457483</link>
      <description>A voluntary statement made before enforcement can be relied on in foreign exchange contravention proceedings even if later retracted, provided the retraction does not establish inducement, threat, or coercion. The statement may also be supported by co-noticee material and recovered documents, including electronic records, which can provide independent corroboration of unauthorised foreign exchange transactions outside India. In quasi-criminal proceedings of this kind, the department need only establish the case on a preponderance of probabilities, and the evidence need not satisfy mathematical precision. On that basis, the finding of contravention was upheld and the penalty sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>