<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1111 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457485</link>
    <description>An appeal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was subject to a mandatory pre-deposit of the penalty amount unless the Tribunal granted waiver for undue hardship. The appellant failed to comply with the conditional order granting time for deposit and also did not appear to explain the default. The Tribunal stated that it could not ignore the consequence attached to non-compliance or rewrite the statutory requirement on equitable grounds, and treated the breach as fatal to maintainability. The appeal was therefore liable to be dismissed for failure to satisfy the pre-deposit condition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:02:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1111 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457485</link>
      <description>An appeal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was subject to a mandatory pre-deposit of the penalty amount unless the Tribunal granted waiver for undue hardship. The appellant failed to comply with the conditional order granting time for deposit and also did not appear to explain the default. The Tribunal stated that it could not ignore the consequence attached to non-compliance or rewrite the statutory requirement on equitable grounds, and treated the breach as fatal to maintainability. The appeal was therefore liable to be dismissed for failure to satisfy the pre-deposit condition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>