<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1104 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457480</link>
    <description>An appeal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act filed beyond the statutory limitation period and outside the prescribed 90-day outer limit for condonation could not be entertained. The Tribunal applied the special limitation scheme in section 52(2), which allows an appeal within 45 days and permits condonation only up to 90 days from the relevant date on sufficient cause. It held that its jurisdiction was confined to those express statutory limits and could not be enlarged by extending limitation beyond the period permitted by the enactment. The appeal was therefore not maintainable on delay grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1104 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457480</link>
      <description>An appeal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act filed beyond the statutory limitation period and outside the prescribed 90-day outer limit for condonation could not be entertained. The Tribunal applied the special limitation scheme in section 52(2), which allows an appeal within 45 days and permits condonation only up to 90 days from the relevant date on sufficient cause. It held that its jurisdiction was confined to those express statutory limits and could not be enlarged by extending limitation beyond the period permitted by the enactment. The appeal was therefore not maintainable on delay grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>