<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds Decision Against RP for Bias, Imposes Rs. 10 Lakh Penalty; Orders IBBI Investigation into Conduct.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81532</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The key points are: The RP acted in a biased manner by rejecting the Operational Creditor&#039;s claims and accepting an Unsecured Financial Creditor&#039;s claim of a paltry sum, making the latter the sole member of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Adjudicating Authority rightly observed that the RP&#039;s conduct needs thorough investigation. The IBBI is directed to investigate the RP&#039;s role and take necessary action. The RP is imposed a cost of Rs. 10 lakhs. The Unsecured Financial Creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1,05,877/- was filed after CIRP initiation, raising suspicions of backdating and.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds Decision Against RP for Bias, Imposes Rs. 10 Lakh Penalty; Orders IBBI Investigation into Conduct.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81532</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The key points are: The RP acted in a biased manner by rejecting the Operational Creditor&#039;s claims and accepting an Unsecured Financial Creditor&#039;s claim of a paltry sum, making the latter the sole member of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Adjudicating Authority rightly observed that the RP&#039;s conduct needs thorough investigation. The IBBI is directed to investigate the RP&#039;s role and take necessary action. The RP is imposed a cost of Rs. 10 lakhs. The Unsecured Financial Creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1,05,877/- was filed after CIRP initiation, raising suspicions of backdating and.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:32:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>