<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1075 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758831</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh held that consulting engineering services rendered by appellant to overseas principals during 2006-2009 qualified as export of services under Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, 2005. Despite services being tailored for Indian projects, appellant had no direct communication with Indian entities and received consideration from overseas principals who uploaded approved designs to central repository. Service tax demand on club/association services abroad was set aside as services were utilized outside India. Appellant&#039;s liability for other services totaling Rs.5,29,728 plus interest was confirmed as previously paid, but all penalties were set aside. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1075 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758831</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh held that consulting engineering services rendered by appellant to overseas principals during 2006-2009 qualified as export of services under Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, 2005. Despite services being tailored for Indian projects, appellant had no direct communication with Indian entities and received consideration from overseas principals who uploaded approved designs to central repository. Service tax demand on club/association services abroad was set aside as services were utilized outside India. Appellant&#039;s liability for other services totaling Rs.5,29,728 plus interest was confirmed as previously paid, but all penalties were set aside. Appeal allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>