https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758837 Rebate under Notification No. 41/2012-ST was admissible where the specified services, including transportation, stuffing, CHA and THC, were used for export of goods; alleged non-compliance with other customs or excise notifications did not justify denial once the rebate notification's own conditions were met. The claim for July to September 2012 was also within limitation because time was reckoned from the original filing within one year of export, not from later re-presentation after clarification. However, the claims were remanded for verification of the original invoices and supporting documents before final processing. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:31:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758837 Rebate under Notification No. 41/2012-ST was admissible where the specified services, including transportation, stuffing, CHA and THC, were used for export of goods; alleged non-compliance with other customs or excise notifications did not justify denial once the rebate notification's own conditions were met. The claim for July to September 2012 was also within limitation because time was reckoned from the original filing within one year of export, not from later re-presentation after clarification. However, the claims were remanded for verification of the original invoices and supporting documents before final processing. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758837