<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38390</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the order under Section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, withdrawing the development rebate on a polygraph off-set machine for the assessment year 1962-63 was not justified. It was found that the reconstitution of the firm did not amount to a transfer of assets as the firm continued to be operated by the same individuals in a different structure. The court emphasized that there was no sale involved, and the reconstitution merely formalized the existing partnership structure. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, ruling in favor of the assessee with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:06:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38390</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the order under Section 155(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, withdrawing the development rebate on a polygraph off-set machine for the assessment year 1962-63 was not justified. It was found that the reconstitution of the firm did not amount to a transfer of assets as the firm continued to be operated by the same individuals in a different structure. The court emphasized that there was no sale involved, and the reconstitution merely formalized the existing partnership structure. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, ruling in favor of the assessee with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>