<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1092 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758848</link>
    <description>NCLAT upheld the rejection of operational creditor&#039;s claims while directing IBBI to investigate the resolution professional&#039;s conduct. The tribunal found the resolution professional acted improperly by rejecting a substantial operational creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1.94 crores while accepting a nominal unsecured financial creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1.05 lakh, effectively manipulating committee composition. The court noted suspicious circumstances including backdated loan agreements and questioned the resolution professional&#039;s neutrality. NCLAT imposed Rs. 10 lakh costs on the appellant and directed compliance reporting to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for proper investigation into professional misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1092 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758848</link>
      <description>NCLAT upheld the rejection of operational creditor&#039;s claims while directing IBBI to investigate the resolution professional&#039;s conduct. The tribunal found the resolution professional acted improperly by rejecting a substantial operational creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1.94 crores while accepting a nominal unsecured financial creditor&#039;s claim of Rs. 1.05 lakh, effectively manipulating committee composition. The court noted suspicious circumstances including backdated loan agreements and questioned the resolution professional&#039;s neutrality. NCLAT imposed Rs. 10 lakh costs on the appellant and directed compliance reporting to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the need for proper investigation into professional misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>