<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758850</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for excess customs duty paid due to a system error, ruling that the time limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act does not apply to mistaken payments. The case was remanded to the respondent for reconsideration within four weeks, emphasizing the need for clarity in refund procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1094 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758850</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s refund claim for excess customs duty paid due to a system error, ruling that the time limitation under Section 27 of the Customs Act does not apply to mistaken payments. The case was remanded to the respondent for reconsideration within four weeks, emphasizing the need for clarity in refund procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>