<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1117 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758873</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases estimation. CIT(A) restricted addition to 12.5% profit element of unverifiable transactions, finding entire transaction amount couldn&#039;t be taxed when only income component was taxable. CIT(A) relied on HC precedent establishing 12.5% addition as fair and reasonable for bogus purchases. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting corresponding sale proceeds weren&#039;t disputed by assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1117 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758873</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding bogus purchases estimation. CIT(A) restricted addition to 12.5% profit element of unverifiable transactions, finding entire transaction amount couldn&#039;t be taxed when only income component was taxable. CIT(A) relied on HC precedent establishing 12.5% addition as fair and reasonable for bogus purchases. ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision, noting corresponding sale proceeds weren&#039;t disputed by assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>