<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758875</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled on transfer pricing adjustments for a Nokia subsidiary engaged in mobile phone manufacturing and software development services. The tribunal upheld treating foreign exchange gains/losses as non-operative for the assessee since all currency risks were transferred to the parent company, distinguishing it from comparables bearing such risks. The tribunal excluded certain comparables including Whirlpool and Penguin Electronics due to functional dissimilarity (home appliances vs mobile phones), and rejected several IT companies for the software development segment due to lack of segmental data or functional differences. Regarding dividend distribution tax, the tribunal held that domestic companies can only claim DTAA benefits if contracting states specifically extend treaty protection for such tax. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1119 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758875</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled on transfer pricing adjustments for a Nokia subsidiary engaged in mobile phone manufacturing and software development services. The tribunal upheld treating foreign exchange gains/losses as non-operative for the assessee since all currency risks were transferred to the parent company, distinguishing it from comparables bearing such risks. The tribunal excluded certain comparables including Whirlpool and Penguin Electronics due to functional dissimilarity (home appliances vs mobile phones), and rejected several IT companies for the software development segment due to lack of segmental data or functional differences. Regarding dividend distribution tax, the tribunal held that domestic companies can only claim DTAA benefits if contracting states specifically extend treaty protection for such tax. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>