https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758881 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was declined where the challenge to reassessment turned on disputed factual assertions about an allegedly unauthorised bank account and related transactions. The court treated those matters as unsuitable for writ determination and noted that the reassessment process had already been preceded by notice under Section 148A(b), an order under Section 148A(d), and notice under Section 148, with a statutory appeal available under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Interference was therefore refused and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory remedy. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2024 08:31:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758881 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 was declined where the challenge to reassessment turned on disputed factual assertions about an allegedly unauthorised bank account and related transactions. The court treated those matters as unsuitable for writ determination and noted that the reassessment process had already been preceded by notice under Section 148A(b), an order under Section 148A(d), and notice under Section 148, with a statutory appeal available under the Income-tax Act, 1961. Interference was therefore refused and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory remedy. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758881