<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1137 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758893</link>
    <description>For searches conducted between 1 July 1995 and 1 January 1997, the statutory scheme for block assessment was treated as a distinct unit separate from regular assessment, and the Gujarat HC held that it did not permit prosecution arising from such block assessments under Sections 276C(1), 277 and 278B. On that basis, the pending criminal complaints were quashed and the applications were allowed. The SC declined to interfere with that judgment and dismissed the Special Leave Petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1137 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758893</link>
      <description>For searches conducted between 1 July 1995 and 1 January 1997, the statutory scheme for block assessment was treated as a distinct unit separate from regular assessment, and the Gujarat HC held that it did not permit prosecution arising from such block assessments under Sections 276C(1), 277 and 278B. On that basis, the pending criminal complaints were quashed and the applications were allowed. The SC declined to interfere with that judgment and dismissed the Special Leave Petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>