<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1149 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758905</link>
    <description>Prior issuance of notice in Form GST ASMT-10 under Rule 99 of the CGST Rules, 2017 was treated as mandatory before a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 could be issued. Because the respondents admitted that ASMT-10 had not been issued, the subsequent DRC-01 notices were found procedurally defective, and further proceedings pursuant to those notices were stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1149 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758905</link>
      <description>Prior issuance of notice in Form GST ASMT-10 under Rule 99 of the CGST Rules, 2017 was treated as mandatory before a show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 could be issued. Because the respondents admitted that ASMT-10 had not been issued, the subsequent DRC-01 notices were found procedurally defective, and further proceedings pursuant to those notices were stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>