<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1152 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758908</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court considered whether a demand arising from the alleged tax default on secondment of foreign employees justified interim intervention and stay of coercive measures. Notice was issued, and coercive action against the petitioner under the impugned order was restrained until the next date of hearing, preserving the petitioner&#039;s interim protection pending further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1152 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758908</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court considered whether a demand arising from the alleged tax default on secondment of foreign employees justified interim intervention and stay of coercive measures. Notice was issued, and coercive action against the petitioner under the impugned order was restrained until the next date of hearing, preserving the petitioner&#039;s interim protection pending further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>