<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1162 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758918</link>
    <description>The SC reviewed a petition challenging a bank account attachment. The attachment was subsequently vacated through an official communication, with the bank directed to follow orders from the Principal Additional Director General. The court disposed of the petition, effectively resolving the account attachment dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1162 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758918</link>
      <description>The SC reviewed a petition challenging a bank account attachment. The attachment was subsequently vacated through an official communication, with the bank directed to follow orders from the Principal Additional Director General. The court disposed of the petition, effectively resolving the account attachment dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>