<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1430 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457465</link>
    <description>A show-cause notice was found vulnerable where the authority had not shown consideration of the petitioner&#039;s detailed reply to the pre-show-cause notice. The court treated the notice as non-speaking and held that issuance without due consideration of the material furnished breached natural justice. The notice was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded to the GST authority for fresh consideration after examining the reply and granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1430 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457465</link>
      <description>A show-cause notice was found vulnerable where the authority had not shown consideration of the petitioner&#039;s detailed reply to the pre-show-cause notice. The court treated the notice as non-speaking and held that issuance without due consideration of the material furnished breached natural justice. The notice was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded to the GST authority for fresh consideration after examining the reply and granting an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>