<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1047 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457443</link>
    <description>Foreign exchange released for training expenses must be supported by evidence of actual utilisation. Where remittance was made for training four officials for a stated period, but only two officials were sent for a shorter duration, the record did not substantiate proper use of the foreign exchange. The Tribunal held that the contravention was established on the material before it and upheld the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1047 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457443</link>
      <description>Foreign exchange released for training expenses must be supported by evidence of actual utilisation. Where remittance was made for training four officials for a stated period, but only two officials were sent for a shorter duration, the record did not substantiate proper use of the foreign exchange. The Tribunal held that the contravention was established on the material before it and upheld the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>