<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1042 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</link>
    <description>Proceedings for contraventions under the repealed foreign-exchange regime remain timely where notice is issued within two years of the commencement of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; the sunset clause restricts cognizance only after that period. Failure to realise export proceeds within the prescribed period creates a rebuttable presumption of contravention. The exporter must establish genuine and reasonable recovery efforts to displace that presumption. A director who participated in export declarations and transactions may be responsible for the default unless statutory obligations were duly discharged or lack of responsibility is established. Penalty may be sustained where unrealised proceeds and insufficient recovery evidence establish the contravention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1042 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</link>
      <description>Proceedings for contraventions under the repealed foreign-exchange regime remain timely where notice is issued within two years of the commencement of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; the sunset clause restricts cognizance only after that period. Failure to realise export proceeds within the prescribed period creates a rebuttable presumption of contravention. The exporter must establish genuine and reasonable recovery efforts to displace that presumption. A director who participated in export declarations and transactions may be responsible for the default unless statutory obligations were duly discharged or lack of responsibility is established. Penalty may be sustained where unrealised proceeds and insufficient recovery evidence establish the contravention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>