<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 1042 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</link>
    <description>The sunset clause under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 was applied to proceedings initiated within two years of commencement, so the limitation objection failed. The note also explains that unrealised export proceeds can trigger a rebuttable presumption of contravention under the export realisation regime, and the exporter must show genuine, reasonable efforts to recover the dues. On the stated facts, no sufficient material showed such efforts, and the director&#039;s participation in the export declarations supported liability for the default. The penalty was treated as proportionate to the contravention and sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:03:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 1042 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</link>
      <description>The sunset clause under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 was applied to proceedings initiated within two years of commencement, so the limitation objection failed. The note also explains that unrealised export proceeds can trigger a rebuttable presumption of contravention under the export realisation regime, and the exporter must show genuine, reasonable efforts to recover the dues. On the stated facts, no sufficient material showed such efforts, and the director&#039;s participation in the export declarations supported liability for the default. The penalty was treated as proportionate to the contravention and sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>