<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38377</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the validity of the Tribunal&#039;s order remanding the matter, allowing the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to consider all aspects without restrictions. The Court clarified that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner should not consider orders no longer existing due to remand. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the appeal for fresh disposal was considered appropriate, especially as the appeal was filed by the department. The Court reframed the original question, aligning it with the case&#039;s circumstances, and supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter. The assessee was awarded costs, and counsel&#039;s fee was fixed at Rs. 500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 23 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38377</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras upheld the validity of the Tribunal&#039;s order remanding the matter, allowing the Appellate Assistant Commissioner to consider all aspects without restrictions. The Court clarified that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner should not consider orders no longer existing due to remand. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the appeal for fresh disposal was considered appropriate, especially as the appeal was filed by the department. The Court reframed the original question, aligning it with the case&#039;s circumstances, and supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter. The assessee was awarded costs, and counsel&#039;s fee was fixed at Rs. 500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>