<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 847 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457430</link>
    <description>A retracted confessional statement can be relied on in foreign exchange contravention proceedings if the retraction is belated, unsubstantiated, and the statement is found voluntary and corroborated by surrounding evidence such as co-noticee testimony, seizure material, and recovered documents. On that footing, contravention of sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was sustained. The penalty may nevertheless be moderated where confiscation of the seized amount has already been ordered and the overall punishment is excessive; accordingly, the monetary penalty was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 14:11:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 847 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457430</link>
      <description>A retracted confessional statement can be relied on in foreign exchange contravention proceedings if the retraction is belated, unsubstantiated, and the statement is found voluntary and corroborated by surrounding evidence such as co-noticee testimony, seizure material, and recovered documents. On that footing, contravention of sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 was sustained. The penalty may nevertheless be moderated where confiscation of the seized amount has already been ordered and the overall punishment is excessive; accordingly, the monetary penalty was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>