<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38374</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the annuity of Rs. 1,000 per month under the agreement dated May 20, 1958, was exempt under section 2(e)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Court emphasized that the agreement did not allow for commutation of any part of the annuity into a lump sum grant, meeting the criteria for exemption. The revenue was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:04:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38374</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the annuity of Rs. 1,000 per month under the agreement dated May 20, 1958, was exempt under section 2(e)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Court emphasized that the agreement did not allow for commutation of any part of the annuity into a lump sum grant, meeting the criteria for exemption. The revenue was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>