<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Brush Cutters Misdeclared as Reapers to Evade Duty; Company Penalized for Knowingly Misclassifying Imports.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81509</link>
    <description>Classification of imported &#039;Brush Cutters&#039; misdeclared as &#039;Power Operated Reapers&#039; to evade higher duty. Tribunal upheld classification under Heading 8467 8990 based on previous decisions. Appellant knowingly misdeclared to claim agricultural equipment subsidy, as evident from instruction manual mentioning &#039;Brush Cutter&#039; though catalogue stated &#039;Power Operated Reaper&#039;. Demand of differential duty, interest, and penalty on company upheld. Confiscation of goods upheld with reduced redemption fine. Penalty on company&#039;s partner reduced. Penalties u/s 114AA set aside. Appeal disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Brush Cutters Misdeclared as Reapers to Evade Duty; Company Penalized for Knowingly Misclassifying Imports.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81509</link>
      <description>Classification of imported &#039;Brush Cutters&#039; misdeclared as &#039;Power Operated Reapers&#039; to evade higher duty. Tribunal upheld classification under Heading 8467 8990 based on previous decisions. Appellant knowingly misdeclared to claim agricultural equipment subsidy, as evident from instruction manual mentioning &#039;Brush Cutter&#039; though catalogue stated &#039;Power Operated Reaper&#039;. Demand of differential duty, interest, and penalty on company upheld. Confiscation of goods upheld with reduced redemption fine. Penalty on company&#039;s partner reduced. Penalties u/s 114AA set aside. Appeal disposed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>