<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1017 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758773</link>
    <description>A cheque issued towards an alleged time-barred debt can amount to a written promise under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, making the liability enforceable for Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused&#039;s inconsistent stand on repayment and the cheque&#039;s purpose failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in favour of the complainant. On the facts proved, the defence of limitation did not displace liability because the cheque itself acknowledged the debt and created a fresh enforceable obligation. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1017 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758773</link>
      <description>A cheque issued towards an alleged time-barred debt can amount to a written promise under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, making the liability enforceable for Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The accused&#039;s inconsistent stand on repayment and the cheque&#039;s purpose failed to rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 in favour of the complainant. On the facts proved, the defence of limitation did not displace liability because the cheque itself acknowledged the debt and created a fresh enforceable obligation. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the matter was directed to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>