<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1036 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758792</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the penalty imposed by the RBI for violating FEMA provisions. The court found that the penalty of Rs. 41,04,675 was computed fairly and in accordance with FEMA guidelines. The petitioner, given an opportunity to be heard, did not opt for a personal hearing, and the court concluded that the penalty imposition was justified and within legal limits, with no grounds for challenging the computation or fairness of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:00:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1036 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758792</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, upholding the penalty imposed by the RBI for violating FEMA provisions. The court found that the penalty of Rs. 41,04,675 was computed fairly and in accordance with FEMA guidelines. The petitioner, given an opportunity to be heard, did not opt for a personal hearing, and the court concluded that the penalty imposition was justified and within legal limits, with no grounds for challenging the computation or fairness of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>