<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1060 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758816</link>
    <description>An earlier writ order granting liberty to approach the Trial Court for discharge was reconsidered because the complaint arose from a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC, not a chargesheet case. On that basis, the contention that Section 258 CrPC was inapplicable was accepted, and the Court held that the prior direction needed recall or variation. The review application was therefore allowed and the order dated 03.07.2024 was recalled or varied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1060 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758816</link>
      <description>An earlier writ order granting liberty to approach the Trial Court for discharge was reconsidered because the complaint arose from a private complaint under Section 200 CrPC, not a chargesheet case. On that basis, the contention that Section 258 CrPC was inapplicable was accepted, and the Court held that the prior direction needed recall or variation. The review application was therefore allowed and the order dated 03.07.2024 was recalled or varied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>