<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1063 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758819</link>
    <description>Kerala HC upheld disallowance of professional consultancy charges as capital expenditure of enduring nature, following SC precedents. Court rejected distinction between direct and indirect IPO expenses, ruling that indirect IPO costs cannot be deducted under Section 37 when direct costs already claimed under Section 35D. PF/ESI contribution disallowance before due date upheld per existing precedent. Prior period expenses claim became moot after Tribunal remand resulted in assessing authority allowing the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1063 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758819</link>
      <description>Kerala HC upheld disallowance of professional consultancy charges as capital expenditure of enduring nature, following SC precedents. Court rejected distinction between direct and indirect IPO expenses, ruling that indirect IPO costs cannot be deducted under Section 37 when direct costs already claimed under Section 35D. PF/ESI contribution disallowance before due date upheld per existing precedent. Prior period expenses claim became moot after Tribunal remand resulted in assessing authority allowing the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>