<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457408</link>
    <description>Permanent Establishment and business connection were not established where the Indian entity operated independently, the arrangement was not a joint venture, and the fixed-place, service and agency PE conditions under the India-USA DTAA were unmet. Business-profit taxability in India therefore failed on that basis. Additional legal grounds on royalty taxation under an Advance Pricing Agreement were admitted because they arose from facts on record, but royalty recomputation was remitted for verification of amounts refundable or adjustable. The royalty ground based on effective connection with a PE did not survive. Interest liability required factual verification and consequential recomputation, so it was also remitted for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 20:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457408</link>
      <description>Permanent Establishment and business connection were not established where the Indian entity operated independently, the arrangement was not a joint venture, and the fixed-place, service and agency PE conditions under the India-USA DTAA were unmet. Business-profit taxability in India therefore failed on that basis. Additional legal grounds on royalty taxation under an Advance Pricing Agreement were admitted because they arose from facts on record, but royalty recomputation was remitted for verification of amounts refundable or adjustable. The royalty ground based on effective connection with a PE did not survive. Interest liability required factual verification and consequential recomputation, so it was also remitted for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>