https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457395 A revision petition filed in the name of the Enforcement Directorate was found procedurally defective because the record did not show any proved authority empowering the Assistant Legal Adviser to institute it under the applicable rules of business. The Tribunal also noted that effective service on the respondents had not been secured despite repeated opportunities, and the addresses supplied by the revisionist were not satisfactorily established. On these facts, the proceeding could not be sustained and the revision petition was held not maintainable and rejected. en-us Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:35:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457395 A revision petition filed in the name of the Enforcement Directorate was found procedurally defective because the record did not show any proved authority empowering the Assistant Legal Adviser to institute it under the applicable rules of business. The Tribunal also noted that effective service on the respondents had not been secured despite repeated opportunities, and the addresses supplied by the revisionist were not satisfactorily established. On these facts, the proceeding could not be sustained and the revision petition was held not maintainable and rejected. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457395