<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1296 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457391</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange dismissed six review petitions due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order under Section 19(1) of the FEM Act, 1999. Despite opportunities provided by the High Court of Madras, the appellants failed to make the required pre-deposit, leading to the dismissal of their appeals. The Tribunal found no grounds for review, as no errors or new evidence were presented. The decision emphasizes the necessity of adhering to pre-deposit requirements and the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to grant dispensation only in cases of undue hardship, underscoring the importance of procedural compliance in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:50:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1296 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FOREIGN EXCHANGE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457391</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange dismissed six review petitions due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order under Section 19(1) of the FEM Act, 1999. Despite opportunities provided by the High Court of Madras, the appellants failed to make the required pre-deposit, leading to the dismissal of their appeals. The Tribunal found no grounds for review, as no errors or new evidence were presented. The decision emphasizes the necessity of adhering to pre-deposit requirements and the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to grant dispensation only in cases of undue hardship, underscoring the importance of procedural compliance in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>