<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38351</link>
    <description>Amounts retained for taxation and dividend purposes were treated as provisions, not reserves, for capital base computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because substance and statutory balance-sheet classification controlled over nomenclature. Sums set aside to meet known liabilities of uncertain quantification fell within the exclusion in the Explanation to rule 1 of the Second Schedule read with Schedule VI and could not be included in capital. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s finding of specific liability and non-reserve character was rejected as supported by the material on record, and the Board circular relied upon did not alter that result on the facts found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=76897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 16 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38351</link>
      <description>Amounts retained for taxation and dividend purposes were treated as provisions, not reserves, for capital base computation under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, because substance and statutory balance-sheet classification controlled over nomenclature. Sums set aside to meet known liabilities of uncertain quantification fell within the exclusion in the Explanation to rule 1 of the Second Schedule read with Schedule VI and could not be included in capital. The challenge to the Tribunal&#039;s finding of specific liability and non-reserve character was rejected as supported by the material on record, and the Board circular relied upon did not alter that result on the facts found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>