<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Importers Partially Win Appeal: Duty Demand Upheld but Limited; Penalties and Extended Limitation Periods Dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81449</link>
    <description>The appellants imported parts classified under different tariff headings used in the manufacture of outdoor cabinets called &#039;telecom racks&#039;. These outdoor cabinets were supplied to M/s Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd., who mounted the outdoor BTS inside the cabinets to generate signals as a &#039;Base Trans receiver Station&#039;. The Tribunal held that the appellants were not eligible for the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002 and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17.03.2012 for the imported parts used in manufacturing outdoor cabinets/telecom racks, which were subsequently used by M/s Ericsson in the manufacture of BTS for telecom service providers. However, the extended period of limitation and penalties imposed we.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Importers Partially Win Appeal: Duty Demand Upheld but Limited; Penalties and Extended Limitation Periods Dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81449</link>
      <description>The appellants imported parts classified under different tariff headings used in the manufacture of outdoor cabinets called &#039;telecom racks&#039;. These outdoor cabinets were supplied to M/s Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd., who mounted the outdoor BTS inside the cabinets to generate signals as a &#039;Base Trans receiver Station&#039;. The Tribunal held that the appellants were not eligible for the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01.03.2002 and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. dated 17.03.2012 for the imported parts used in manufacturing outdoor cabinets/telecom racks, which were subsequently used by M/s Ericsson in the manufacture of BTS for telecom service providers. However, the extended period of limitation and penalties imposed we.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>