<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Reassessment Notice Quashed: Lack of Jurisdiction and Incorrect Assumptions Cited by Court.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81444</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns disclosing long-term capital gains from the sale of land, which was subjected to scrutiny during the regular assessment. The Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as there was no failure on the assessee&#039;s part to disclose fully and truly all material facts relevant for the assessment. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were incorrect, based on assumptions and presumptions without any basis. The Court ruled that the reopening notice was impermissibly issued based on an audit objection, without any fresh tangible information .....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer&#039;s Reassessment Notice Quashed: Lack of Jurisdiction and Incorrect Assumptions Cited by Court.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81444</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the reopening notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 for reassessment beyond the period of four years. The assessee had filed returns disclosing long-term capital gains from the sale of land, which was subjected to scrutiny during the regular assessment. The Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment as there was no failure on the assessee&#039;s part to disclose fully and truly all material facts relevant for the assessment. The reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were incorrect, based on assumptions and presumptions without any basis. The Court ruled that the reopening notice was impermissibly issued based on an audit objection, without any fresh tangible information .....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=81444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>