<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 920 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758676</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad determined that the appellant is not obligated to pay 6% on the differential between the sale and purchase price of goods when common input service credit was utilized. The appellant reversed the proportionate credit and paid the applicable interest, rendering the demand unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=768739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 920 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758676</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad determined that the appellant is not obligated to pay 6% on the differential between the sale and purchase price of goods when common input service credit was utilized. The appellant reversed the proportionate credit and paid the applicable interest, rendering the demand unsustainable. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>